Skip to content

Dresden, the Blanche DuBois of Germany

Studio Daniel Libeskind - Military History Museum, Dresden

The February 1, 2010 issue of The New Yorker contains an article by George Packer about the Allied fire-bombing of Dresden on February 13, 1945, the topic of W.G. Sebald’s lectures in On the Natural History of DestructionThe New Yorker online has a summary of the article and a short slide show, but the full text of Packer’s article can only be read by subscribers or in the print edition.

Packer is interested in how the city has attempted to recuperate its self-image (was it the guilty party or the victim?) through its still-ongoing reconstruction.   In a reference to Tennessee William’s play A Streetcar Named Desire, he calls Dresden “the Blanche DuBois of German cities – violated, complicit in its violation, desperate to recover its innocence.”

Packer also talks with Daniel Libeskind, who is transforming the city’s Alberstadt arsenal into a Military History Museum, which, Packer says, “will surely cause outrage when it is completed.”  Libeskind calls the design for the building “an interruption.”  “It will be impossible for visitors to tour the traditional rooms without passing through the trapezoidal openings in Libeskind’s disorientingly angled concrete-slab walls ” – walls that soar “upward in every conceivable angle except ninety degrees.”

As Libeskind tours Packer around the construction site they reach the top floor, which, fittingly, is not level. Libeskind turns to Packer and says: “It’s like a collapse, isn’t it?  You feel it in your knees – do you feel it?  Maybe it’s the reflex of a body feeling that a building’s collapsing on it.  You can’t be neutral in these spaces.”  Sebald, it seems to me, often intervened in history so that the floors were no longer level, giving the reader the feeling that everything was on the verge of collapsing inward.

There’s more information about this project on Daniel Libeskind’s website.

2 Comments Post a comment
  1. Mark Silverman #

    Aaah … another museum willing to induldge Daniel Libeskind’s pretentious whims. Perhaps Dresden will fare better but they would do well to look at Toronto where Libeskind’s Royal Ontario Museum has been described as “the most perverse and disastrous museum expansion in living memory”, or to Denver’s Art Museum which leaked for three years and where artists had to be specially commissioned to come up with pieces to suit Libeskind;s sloped, clumsy, awkward and disorienting galleries. – Of course Daniel & Nina Libeskind commissioned a real architect (Alex Gorlin) to design their own home. Evidently Libeskind wasn’t to keen on the idea of “collapse” when his own real-estate investment was at stake.

    February 1, 2010
  2. P.T. Smith #

    Thanks for linking to this. I’d read the article and from the very beginning was waiting for the Sebald reference. I never thought to look up any images though, so thanks.

    February 1, 2010

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: